In class this week, we briefly discussed social media and the spiral of silence theory.
More and more every day, social media advances and raises the question of how free we really are? Though social media can be a beautiful place to go spend your time and connect with your family, friends, and peers; it also can be a negative and toxic place. I think it is really common for youth, young adults, and adults to voice their opinions on specific things online since it is easier to do than in real life. Believe it or not, people actually listen. That sense of security, makes everyone feel better, and makes them feel powerful and heard, But sometimes the opinions that people preach can be extremely cruel, hurtful, or offensive. Social media including Facebook and Twitter have the highest amount of members so liking, commenting, or sharing negative things can be damaging towards both the victim and the harasser.
It is impossible to evade criticism nowadays. There are simply too many review sites for you to keep anything quiet. Word-of-mouth recommendations mean so much more than they used to pre-internet because one harsh comment can spread around the globe instantly. If someone criticizes something, it is important to respond and to respond constructively. Not only is this good morals, but it also reassures anyone who stumbles on these comments that you do care and that you actively try to resolve negative situations. In addition, leaving criticism without a reply merely serves to reinforce their statement.
Originally proposed by German political scientist Elizabeth-Noelle Neumann 1974, Spiral of Silence is a theory meant to refer to the tendency of people remaining silent when they feel that their views are in opposition to the majority view on a subject. This theory suggests that they remain silent for a few reasons: I) Fear of isolation when the group or public realizes that the individual has a different opinion from them. II) Fear of more extreme isolation including losing a job or friends. III) May feel unsupported by other employees.
The closer an individual feels their opinion resides to the held majority opinion, the more likely they are to be willing to voice it in public discourse. There are two major factors to mention. One is that this theory relies heavily on the idea that the opinion must have a distinct morally changed issue (abortion, gay marriage, or drug legalization.) No one will experience the spiral of silence when trying to decide with your roommates on the toppings you want on pizza.




































